5.6.4以后时间类型（TIME,DATETIME,TIMESTAMP)支持微秒
DATETIME范围 ：'1000-01-01 00:00:00.000000' to '9999-12-31 23:59:59.999999'
TIMESTAMP范围： values is '1970-01-01 00:00:01.000000' to'2038-01-19 03:14:07.999999'
use test
CREATE TABLE fractest( c1 TIME(2), c2 DATETIME(2), c3 TIMESTAMP(2) );INSERT INTO fractest VALUES ('17:51:04.777', '2014-09-08 17:51:04.777', '2014-09-08 17:51:04.777');SELECT * FROM fractest;
+-------------+------------------------+------------------------+| c1 | c2 | c3 |+-------------+------------------------+------------------------+| 17:51:04.78 | 2014-09-08 17:51:04.78 | 2014-09-08 17:51:04.78 |+-------------+------------------------+------------------------+
use test
CREATE TABLE fractest( c1 TIME, c2 DATETIME, c3 TIMESTAMP );INSERT INTO fractest VALUES ('17:51:04.777', '2014-09-08 17:51:04.777', '2014-09-08 17:51:04.777');SELECT * FROM fractest;
+----------+---------------------+---------------------+| c1 | c2 | c3 |+----------+---------------------+---------------------+| 17:51:04 | 2014-09-08 17:51:04 | 2014-09-08 17:51:04 |+----------+---------------------+---------------------+
mysql> select CURTIME(2);+-------------+| CURTIME(2) |+-------------+| 11:26:56.43 |+-------------+
5.6.4以前，TIME,DATETIME,TIMESTAMP 分别固定占用3，8，4字节
5.6.4以后，TIME,DATETIME,TIMESTAMP占有大小取决于微秒的精度。
TIME3 bytes + fractional seconds storageDATETIME5 bytes + fractional seconds storageTIMESTAMP4 bytes + fractional seconds storage而微秒的存储长度和精度的关系如下
Fractional Seconds PrecisionStorage Required00 bytes1, 21 byte3, 42 bytes5, 63 bytes
例如上例中的c1 TIME： 占4字节，c2 DATETIME占6字节,TIMESTAMP 占7字节，TIMESTAMP占用5字节
相关函数可以参考my_datetime_packed_to_binary
5.6 内部增加了一些新的时间类型
MYSQL_TYPE_TIMESTAMP2
MYSQL_TYPE_DATETIME2,MYSQL_TYPE_TIME2,
用于支持微秒的存储。
而老的时间类型
MYSQL_TYPE_TIMESTAMP，MYSQL_TYPE_DATETIME，MYSQL_TYPE_TIME
仍然保留和支持，从而兼容老的时间数据
5.6 新建的表时间字段默认使用新的类型，参考如下代码
sql/sql_yacc.yy:6514
| DATETIME type_datetime_precision { $$= MYSQL_TYPE_DATETIME2; }
binlog的Table_map_log_event中会记录表的元数据信息，包括库，表，列信息等。新时间类型的微秒精度信息就作为列的元数据（m_field_metadata）进行存储。类似的大字段列的列元数据存储大字段的实际长度（Field_blob::do_save_field_metadata）。
1 master 上执行
use zy
CREATE TABLE t1 (id int primary key, c1 TIME, c2 DATETIME, c3 TIMESTAMP );
set sql_log_bin=0;
alter table t1 modify c3 timestamp(4);
set sql_log_bin=1;
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (10, '17:51:04.98887', '2014-09-08 17:51:04.866666', '2014-09-08 17:51:04.777');
2 slave上执行
show slave status\G
Last_Errno: 1677
Last_Error: Column 3 of table 'zy.t1' cannot be converted from type 'timestamp' to type 'timestamp'
1）先尝试修复，修改slave_type_conversions='ALL_LOSSY';参数slave_type_conversions可以参考 http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/replication-options-slave.html#sysvar_slave_type_conversions
mysql> show variables like 'slave_type_conversions'; +------------------------+-------+ | Variable_name | Value | +------------------------+-------+ | slave_type_conversions | | +------------------------+-------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> set global slave_type_conversions='ALL_LOSSY'; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) show slave status\G Last_Errno: 1610 Last_Error: Could not execute Write_rows event on table zy.t1; Corrupted replication event was detected, Error_code: 1610; handler error No Error!; the event's master log mysql-bin.000002, end_log_pos 550
发现备库用备库的表结构信息解析binlog行数据(unpack_row)时出错，因此，此方法修复失败。
2）查看源码：
Rows_log_event::do_apply_event table_def::compatible_with can_convert_field_to .... if (field->real_type() == source_type)//本例主备类型一致 { if (metadata == 0) // Metadata can only be zero if no metadata was provided // 本例主库精度为4 { /* If there is no metadata, we either have an old event where no metadata were supplied, or a type that does not require any metadata. In either case, conversion can be done but no conversion table is necessary. */ DBUG_PRINT( "debug" , ("Base types are identical, but there is no metadata")); *order_var= 0; DBUG_RETURN( true ); } DBUG_PRINT( "debug" , ("Base types are identical, doing field size comparison")); if (field->compatible_field_size(metadata, rli, mflags, order_var)) DBUG_RETURN(is_conversion_ok(*order_var, rli)); else DBUG_RETURN( false ); } else if (metadata == 0 && //这里有对新老时间类型的兼容处理 ((field->real_type() == MYSQL_TYPE_TIMESTAMP2 && source_type == MYSQL_TYPE_TIMESTAMP) || (field->real_type() == MYSQL_TYPE_TIME2 && source_type == MYSQL_TYPE_TIME) || (field->real_type() == MYSQL_TYPE_DATETIME2 && source_type == MYSQL_TYPE_DATETIME))) { /* TS-TODO: conversion from FSP1>FSP2. Can do non-lossy conversion from old TIME, TIMESTAMP, DATETIME to new TIME(0), TIMESTAMP(0), DATETIME(0). */ *order_var= -1; DBUG_RETURN( true); }上面代码进行类型兼容性判断，本例由于精度不一致在is_conversion_ok处会返回失败。
转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/justfortaste/p/4119722.html
